5.3.10

Forsker Ragnfrid Kogstad om menneskerettigheter og psykiatri

"Protecting mental health clients' dignity - the importance of legal control"

Users of mental health services as well as other people have the right to express their needs, influence their treatment and be regarded as equal participants in society.

The gap between public values and clients' experiences has been noted by the Council of Europe, as well as by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which monitors the protection of human rights in Europe.

Factors which may influence attitude and treatment of mental health clients:

• Definitions of otherness

In several health service settings, a culture has developed which dictates that mental health clients may be treated differently from somatic clients, and ethical principles may be applied differently.

• Reductionist explanations

The way contextual factors such as economy and social situation influence mental illness is often overlooked. Causes outside the individual may then be localized inside the person.

• Broad professional credentials

Professionals traditionally take action on behalf of these clients, while their subjective needs and opinions are overlooked.

The analysis of clients' narratives verifies the existence of a gap between human rights' aims and clients' experiences in several settings. There is a lack of safeguards against infringement. Infringement has substantial consequences in both the short and long term, and it becomes embedded in people's minds and influences the quality of their lives. Hundreds of reflective, detailed and consistent stories told by clients about situations in which they were not listened to or granted credibility provide documented evidence of a mental health service system marked by a lack of responsiveness towards people who are more than able to express themselves.

Mental health clients experience infringements that cannot be explained without reference to their status as clients in a system which, based on judgments from medical experts, has a legitimate right to ignore clients' voices as well as their fundamental human rights.

To bring about changes, recommendations and practices should be harmonized with the new UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.


Share/Bookmark

1 kommentar:

  1. Veldig bra at norske forskere på høyeste nivå, som Ragnfrid Kogstad, setter tvang i psykiatrien på dagsorden! Tusen takk! For øvrig lurer jeg på hva Council of Europe (Europarådet), som nevnt innledningsvis, har lagt merke til? Ettersom EMK artikkel 5 fortsatt tillater tvangsinnleggelse av sinnsidende, så er jeg spesielt interessert i å få vite dette... Hva er det Europarådet har reagert på når det gjelder tvang i psykiatrien? Og så ser jeg frem til at de mange historiene som Ragnfrid Kogstad har samlet inn blir fremlagt, det vil virkelig kunne bli et veldig viktig bidrag til at denne verden skal forstå... for som hun skriver, det er sannelig mange av oss som er i stand til å uttrykke oss, men vi får ikke respons fra verken psykiatrien eller andre relevante instanser på det vi uttrykker, langt mindre legger de til rette for dialog med oss... Så tusen takk igjen til Ragnfrid Kogstad for at vi settes på dagsorden, og for at hun og noen få andre hederlige unntak tar på alvor det som vi uttrykker! Tusen, tusen takk...

    SvarSlett

Virker ikke lenken(e)? Da vil jeg bli kjempeglad om du har tid til å gi meg beskjed via kontaktskjemaet i bloggens sidefelt.

- LAGE LENKE: <a href="url-adresse">Lenkens navn</a>

- BRUK NAVN, ditt virkelige eller et fiktivt. Velg Navn/nettadresse (ikke Anonym), og skriv inn navnet. Nettadresse er ikke nødvendig.
- Logger du inn med Google-konto, kan du få kommentarer tilsendt på e-post.
- Kommentarer som ikke holder seg til saken eller er personangrep eller trakassering, kan bli slettet.

Motta nye innlegg på e-post